<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Email on Brian Carroll</title><link>https://briancarroll.cool/tags/email/</link><description>Recent content in Email on Brian Carroll</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.147.6</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://briancarroll.cool/tags/email/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Outlook is the Best Productivity Tool Ever, Part 1</title><link>https://briancarroll.cool/blog/outlook-is-the-best-productivity-tool-ever-part-1/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://briancarroll.cool/blog/outlook-is-the-best-productivity-tool-ever-part-1/</guid><description>&lt;p>I wrote that headline to bother my brother, who despises Outlook. This post is not really about Outlook, although it is central to the topic. I really want to write about how I manage work and as a response to Ian Bogost’s article in the Atlantic about the terribleness of email.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I adopted David Allen’s Getting Things Done (GTD) process and refined it for many years. I use Outlook as my inbox, with tasks as the central, actionable record.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>